Insights

Despite its value, Penetration Testing is often misunderstood. Misconceptions not only hold organisations back from commissioning tests, but can also create a false sense of security or leave businesses exposed.

Cyber attacks dominate headlines, but there’s another threat that is just as dangerous — and often easier for attackers to exploit. While businesses invest heavily in firewalls, endpoint protection, and cloud defences, many leave the physical front door wide open. A skilled intruder doesn’t need to hack your systems if they can simply walk in, bypass access controls, and steal sensitive data.

Enterprise attack surfaces are expanding faster than most teams can track. Internet-facing services spin up across hybrid cloud, legacy systems linger for business reasons, and third-party integrations widen exposure. Meanwhile, boards and regulators want clearer proof that risk is understood and controlled, across frameworks such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS, DORA and NIS2. Add stretched teams, patch backlogs and alert fatigue, and it is easy to miss weaknesses on the perimeter where attackers most often start. An External Vulnerability Infrastructure Assessment tackles that visibility gap by focusing on the systems adversaries can see first.

Cyber security is not a concern reserved only for large enterprises. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are firmly in the crosshairs of cyber criminals too and with the increasing reliance on digital tools, cloud platforms and remote work their attack surface is large.

In today’s complex threat landscape, every organisation, from local SMEs to multinational enterprises, faces a relentless stream of cyber threats. While the need for robust cyber security is widely recognised, quantifying that risk in practical, business-relevant terms is a challenge many still struggle with. This is where cyber risk quantification (CRQ) comes into play.

Organisations need to ensure that every layer of their digital infrastructure is secure. The old days of testing are over and no longer cut it alone. To that end Integrity360 offers an extensive range of penetration testing services designed to uncover weaknesses and strengthen resilience in all areas of your business or organisation. In this blog we explore the different types of penetration testing that Integrity360 provides to safeguard businesses from cyber risks.

If you're responsible for your organisation’s cyber security, you already know that reacting to threats isn’t enough. You need to stay ahead of them. That’s where cyber security testing comes in.

It doesn't matter how large your organisation is, you are at risk and sooner or later cyber criminals will try to attack you. It’s not a matter of whether your organisation will face a security incident but when. That's why a robust incident response plan is crucial. So what elements should your incident response plan include to be truly effective?

Cyber security threats are growing more sophisticated by the day and organisations need to stay ahead of adversaries by continuously refining their security strategies. One powerful approach is Purple Teaming—a strategy that bridges the gap between offensive and defensive security tactics. But what exactly is Purple Teaming, and how does it enhance an organisation’s security posture? Let’s take a closer look at this critical aspect of cyber security testing.

As businesses are increasingly reliant on technology, the need for robust security measures has become more important than ever. With cybercrime showing no signs of slowing down, organisations must take proactive steps to protect their data and systems from malicious threat actors.  

The surge in cyber threats over the past decade has made it necessary for companies to actively safeguard their systems and data. One of the proactive strategies used in this context is penetration testing, also known as 'pen testing' or ethical hacking.

In the spirit of Cyber Security Awareness Month, Integrity360 is calling for businesses to look beyond basic cyber security measures. As cyber threats evolve, traditional techniques like strong passwords and periodic software updates leave organisations vulnerable to more sophisticated attacks.